United Way of Kenosha County Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 390806285
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Kenosha, WI, USA
- Phone
- 2626584104
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Federated Giving Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,191,750
- Expenses
- $1,123,686
- Assets
- $1,340,388
- Liabilities
- $159,162
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
26 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TANYA RUDER (PRESIDENT)
- JACQUELINE MORRIS (PRESIDENT (THRU MAR 2025))
- CAROLYNN FRIESCH (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- CAROLYNN FRIESCH (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $93,370 total reported compensation
- BETH GRIFFEN (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE): $69,770 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of united way of kenosha county is to connect caring voices and maximize resources to collectively strengthen and uplift kenosha county. We envision a kenosha county where all individuals are healthy, educated, and economically stable.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community impact - at united way of kenosha county (henceforth known as uwkc), we believe in the power of maximizing community impact by mobilizing the caring power of individuals and working in collaboration with local agency partners to make a critical difference in our community. We envision a kenosha county where all individuals are healthy, educated, and economically stable.uwkc impacts individuals and families in our local community by investing in a variety of local, state, and national united way initiatives, as well as various programs at our partner provider agencies. These combined efforts provide community solutions and deliver measurable results. Uwkc is guided by groups of volunteers who are responsible for governance, overseeing operations and the annual community investment process. The key focus areas for uwkc, both locally and nationally, are education, financial stability, and health. Uwkc addresses these areas in the following ways: educationhelping children and youth achieve their potentialgoals: children/youth improve academic achievement. Children/youth demonstrate positive engagement at school and in their community.education is the cornerstone of individual and community success. Strong, productive communities are dependent upon a skilled workforce that can compete in a global economy. According to the national center for education statistics, there were 2 million school dropouts between the ages of 16-24 nationwide in 2020. America, and kenosha county, face an education crisis. In kenosha county, two out of three third graders cannot read proficiently, which is an early indicator of ability to succeed in school. What is the cost of this alarming trend? The answer, more than $544 billion in lost wages, taxes and productivity over their lifetimes. These trends are reversible, but only when communities and public, private, and nonprofit sectors work together.uwkc works to achieve education goals by leading the following community initiatives: kenosha county youth as resources (yar)kenosha county youth as resources (yar) is a grant-giving program that funds youth-designed, youth-led community service projects. Youth, with guidance from adults, determine and prioritize the projects they believe will address a need in their community. Youth groups may apply to yar for small grants of up to $500, which may be used to purchase supplies for a project. The yar board invites youth groups to present their service project proposals directly to the board at three time per year for review meetings and then allocates funding after reviewing all applications.yar was developed out of a need - a need to make the youth of kenosha county feel more connected to their community. According to results from a 2010 search institute survey of kenosha county youth, only 27% feel that they are given useful roles in the community. An even lower 25% of youth feel that adults value them. Yar is a program of uwkc in partnership with university of Wisconsin madison extension kenosha county.during the 2024-2025 program year, youth as resource, consisting of 8 high school members and three adult members, awarded $3,500 across 7 service projects read across kenosha: a community literacy eventread across kenosha: a community literacy event took place on thursday, march 6, 2025, in partnership with kenosha unified school district, bristol school district, riverview elementary, and salem school district, and in conjunction with the national "read across america" event. This year, 192 volunteers read with k-3rd grade classrooms. Books featured various authors and titles, guided by the national education association and kusd. Sponsorships and community donations helped provide children's books to each of the 200+ classrooms.readers are leaders tutoring programthe readers are leaders tutoring program is an early grade reading initiative that helps children build the critical reading skills needed to succeed in school and life. Through this tuto
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 79% for direct work, and 21% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.3%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 83.6%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $14.91 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 70.7%; rating input score 71; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.7%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.19; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.5%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.3% of revenue deployed · 83.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $939K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $93K · 26 people listed
- Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 9 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 50/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.