United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
560529948
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Charlotte, NC, USA
Phone
7043727170
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Federated Giving Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$17,113,009
Expenses
$22,400,683
Assets
$26,676,212
Liabilities
$7,226,189

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

35 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LAURA YATES CLARK (PRESIDENT/CEO (THRU 6/24))
  • KATHRYN FIRMIN-SELLERS (INTERIM PRESIDENT /CEO (AS OF 7/24))

Highest reported compensation

  • KATHRYN FIRMIN-SELLERS (INTERIM PRESIDENT /CEO (AS OF 7/24)): $232,522 total reported compensation
  • LAURA YATES CLARK (PRESIDENT/CEO (THRU 6/24)): $230,479 total reported compensation
  • CLINT HILL (CHIEF DEVELOP. OFFICER (THRU 3/25)): $197,211 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

United way uses collective giving to build pathways to economic opportunity for all, primarily through neighborhood-based, grassroots and responsive solutions.continued on schedule o.united way was founded 90 years ago in mecklenburg county as "emergency relief" to help people affected by the great depression through the power of collective giving.we work as a focused, collaborative team within greater charlotte, developing tailored solutions for each part of our region to address economic mobility. Serving anson, cabarrus, mecklenburg and union counties, our actions align with the strategies identified by residents of those communities.leadership: collaborating with local government agencies, businesses, faith communities, donors and volunteers to mobilize resources quickly and efficiently and advance lasting solutions, united way is ensuring the most vulnerable populations have the opportunity to achieve economic mobility.

What it reported doing in 2024

Community investment: the community investment process focuses on economic mobility across the region, while also helping provide a safety net for people and families in need. Annually, united way of greater charlotte invests in more than 100 local nonprofit agencies and initiatives through the funding provided by generous corporate and private foundations, the public sector, and individual donors.(continued on schedule o) united way tailors its community investment process to the assets, strengths and needs of each county in our four-county footprint. In mecklenburg county, united way funds two initiatives:1) through united neighborhoods, united way supports resident-driven neighborhood revitalization efforts that improve economic mobility so that a person's zip code no longer determines their future success in the charlotte region. United way launched united neighborhoods in september 2017 with an investment over three years into the grier heights and renaissance west neighborhoods in charlotte. We expanded to the lakeview neighborhood in fy22. In fy23, united way deepened our commitment to united neighborhoods, investing $4.9m in 50+ historically disinvested neighborhoods in the city of charlotte, and in northern mecklenburg county.united neighborhoods focuses on partnerships with residents, community leaders, businesses, and nonprofits, backed by multi-year funding and staff resources from united way. United neighborhoods serves 50+ neighborhood's in mecklenburg county focusing on funding community quarterback organizations for each geography as well as nonrofit agencies providing direct programs and services based on neighborhood priorties. Neighborhood residents participate in creating priorities and serving on grant review panels, selecting the nonprofits that receive funding to provide services within their communities. 51% of each neighborhood grant review panel must be neighborhood residents.united neighborhoods also supports neighborhoods that are in the early stages of comprehensive revitalization with "block building grants." these grants are focused on building the capacity of small neighborhood organizations, funding community engagement activities and completing resident-driven neighborhood planning to identify needs and solutions.2) unite charlotte supports new and grassroots organizations through grants and capacity-building activities. Unite charlotte was founded as a collaborative effort with other local funders and community leaders to address issues that led to the unrest in charlotte in the fall of 2016. Through this initiative, united way supports 55 small and grassroots organizations, working to support and empower all charlotte residents. United charlotte agencies receive grants ranging from $20,000 to $60,000 as well as capacity building training. The founders and leaders of these grassroots organizations have a background and experience in the community they serve.united way funding, technical assistance and guidance help stabilize and grow nonprofits, preparing them to secure additional public and private funding. We also work to strengthen the leadership capabilities within unite charlotte organizations. Dedicated volunteers participated in the grant review process, evaluating agency applications to identify those organizations that can generate the greatest impact.in anson county, united way funding supports organizations addressing residents' basic needs, including food security, rent and utility assistance, and housing. Recognizing the importance of providing children and youth a pathway out of poverty, united way also supported organizations focused on early childhood development and youth mentoring. Volunteers awarded funding to four agencies working in anson county.in cabarrus county, united way's investments support a collaboration between mental health professionals and community organizations. Broadly, the collaborative's goals are to reduce stigma around mental health, prepare individual

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 70% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 88
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 99.3%; rating input score 99
  • Program expense ratio: 72.8%; rating input score 73
  • Fundraising efficiency: $9.51 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 97%; rating input score 97; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -30.9%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.19; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.6%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.9% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 99.3% of revenue deployed · 72.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 27 of 27 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $16.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $233K · 35 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $556K reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 218 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 210 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 46/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.