United Way of Elgin Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 362167052
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017
- Location
- Elgin, IL, USA
- Phone
- 8477412259
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Federated Giving Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $838,247
- Expenses
- $837,658
- Assets
- $1,761,745
- Liabilities
- $47,438
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LYNNE BOSLEY (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- LYNNE BOSLEY (PRESIDENT): $120,541 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Building community. Improving lives. Making every contribution count.
What it reported doing in 2017
Education: our goal is to ensure that all families have the capacity to act as primary caregivers by creating home and school environments where children and youth have every opportunity to become educated, secure and prepared for adulthood. Goal 1: success by 6/creating successful early learners - provide children with the core skills to succeed in school and ensure a healthy start. Example: through early childhood learning programs at ywca elgin, 61 preschool children had access to quality affordable programing and educational opportunities; 96% reached age-appropriate developmental milestones. Northern Illinois food bank, 236 chronically hungry students received a backpack filled with enough nutritious food for themselves and their siblings throughout the school year. Goal 2: reading success - build literacy skills to ensure all students are reading at grade level by the end of the 3rd grade. Example: through both the boys & girls club of elgin and ywca elgin, 154 elementary and middle school students particpated in quality afterschool programs, motivating them to stay in school and decrease risky behaviors. An after-school tutoring program for 3rd graders helped 83% improve their reading skills in one school year. Goal 3: college and career readiness - provide opportunities for college and career readiness to ensure a community of engaged and successful adults. Example: at the youth leadership academy, 90% of cadets exhibited imporved academic performance; 99% demonstrated improvment in social/emotional skills.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 73% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The required major-donor schedule is missing or incomplete and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 81.1%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: $14.78 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 95.4%; rating input score 95; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: No; rating input score 0
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.1%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.1; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.4%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.3% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.5% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82% of revenue deployed · 81.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $679K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $121K · 24 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2011 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 22 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 20 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Major donor itemization scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 54/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.