United Way of Asheville and Buncombe County Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
560576157
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Asheville, NC, USA
Phone
8282550696
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Federated Giving Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$16,342,723
Expenses
$9,615,015
Assets
$15,286,019
Liabilities
$508,417

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

27 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANIEL LEROY (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • DANIEL LEROY (CEO): $159,345 total reported compensation
  • MICHAEL EDWARDS (VP COMM. IMP): $123,846 total reported compensation
  • APRIL LAMBERT (VP FINANCE): $109,542 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We mobilize and support a robust network of people, partners, and resources to co-create opportunities for every person in our community to live free from poverty and injustice.

What it reported doing in 2024

Community schools every child deserves the chance to reach their full potential. United way is committed to working with community partners to clear the path to success, from early childhood through college and career. Our staff show up to work every day in one of nine public schools where they are responsible for aligning resources and partnerships to create hubs of support for students and families. One example: between september 4 and december 18, 2025, 4,382 people attended the 55 community nights held at local schools. Families found a healthy meal for the whole family, opportunities to connect with teachers and neighbors, and access academic support for their children. United for youth this multi-generational, cross-sector, cradle-to-career partnership was forged between asheville city schools, buncombe county schools, united way of asheville and buncombe county, and representatives of local health, social service, higher education, and youth services community partners. Ensuring that by 2035, all youth graduate from high school ready to achieve their goals and dreams is the group's bold community goal. The united for youth leadership team, which included members representing each school district, city, and county governments, alongside 14 other key partners, met throughout the year to outline the strategy for doing just that. Mobilizing volunteers hands on asheville-buncombe, united way's volunteer center, makes it easy for individuals and groups to get involved in meaningful volunteer opportunities with local nonprofit organizations and schools. Our staff works closely with local businesses, providing ways for teams to support our community. And during times of crisis, we play a key role in response efforts, as we did during hurricane helene. One example of this work in action: we secured 17 americorps nccc crewmembers last year. Together, these federally funded workers helped our community distribute 30,000 lbs of groceries and 25,000 lbs of essential supplies, remove 2,400 lbs of debris, and assist in building 10 homes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 60% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 60
  • Transparency & Controls: 78
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 76
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 48.6%; rating input score 49
  • Program expense ratio: 81.7%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $16.39 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 95.7%; rating input score 96; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 41.2%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.59; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.1%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 48.6% of revenue deployed · 81.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 24 of 24 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $159K · 27 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $1.8M reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 36 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 33 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 52/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.