United Way of Addison County Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 030221018
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Middlebury, VT, USA
- Phone
- 8023887189
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Federated Giving Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,906,614
- Expenses
- $1,838,188
- Assets
- $2,866,112
- Liabilities
- $447,981
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KEN STOCKMANLEFT MAY 2025 (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- HELENA VAN VOORST (EXECUTIVE DI): $111,109 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
For 57 years, our mission has been to mobilize the compassion and generosity of individuals and organizations in addison county to improve lives and strengthen the community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community leadership & initiatives: this program includes initiatives that are developed and led by uwac to bring collaborative programming to meet unmet or under-met needs in the community that align with our impact areas: 1. Health (& education) - the organization continued its three multi- year federal substance abuse prevention grants. The first of which was the partners for success (pfs) grant, which ended in december 2025 upon conclusion of its programmatic obligation.for five years, partners for success funding was used to inform and educate youth populations about the dangers of underage substance use, empowering youth to make informed decisions about their health and well-being. Providing youth leadership opportunities and increasing youth protective factors through education, special trainings, evidence based programming, and policy change were key objectives of the pfs initiative. Final pfs grant funding in fy25 totaled 103,727. Uwac continued its drug free communities(dfc) funding used to inform and educate parents and adult populations about the dangers of underage substance use, empowering them to more effectively influence and guide youth into better decision-making and an increased likelihood of positive outcomes. Media campaigns, events, special trainings, and policy change are the main strategies to achieve these goals under the dfc initiative. Dfc grant year 6 funding totals 125,000 and overlaps fiscal years 2025 and 2026. Uwac also continued its second year of funding under the stop act grant, also called the "sober truth on preventing underage drinking act grant". The purpose of this program is to prevent and reduce alcohol use among youth and young adults ages 12-20. It aims to address the norms regarding alcohol use by youth, reduce opportunities for underage drinking, create changes in underage drinking enforcement efforts, address penalties for underage use, and reduce negative consequences associated with underage drinking. The stop act grant provides uwac with 60,000 in funding per year for four years, the second year of which overlaps fiscal years 2025 and 2026.uwac concluded its third and final year of local youth vaping prevention initiatives funded by the Vermont department of health, division of substance use programs(dsu) in the amount of 23,392. 2. Education - the organization purchased 628 backpacks with school supplies for distribution at partner sites in addison county for local kindergarten, elementary, and secondary school students. 3. Financial stability - the organization released 15,000 in previously designated funds to assist addison county residents who have either experienced homelessness or are in immediate risk of it, continuing a community collaboration formed in fiscal year 2022 with our partner agencies who offer direct services to at-risk individuals. This collaboration meets as a group at least monthly to confidentially discuss various funding requests for approval. Upon approval by the group, case managers then file the appropriate reimbursement paperwork with uwac after their organization has initiated third-party payments for items such as back rent, security deposits, overdue utility bills, and emergency motel housing. This funding is specifically targeted at requests that are otherwise ineligible for any other federal, state, or local financial assistance. An additional 120,000 in designated funds for this purpose will be released at a rate of 20,000/year in fiscal years 2026 through 2031.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 77% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 69% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.9%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 80.5%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $14.33 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 80.2%; rating input score 80; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.6%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.56; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.9% of revenue deployed · 80.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $111K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 36 of 37 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 29 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 28 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 49/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 50/100.