United States Women's National Soccer Team Players' Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
043631930
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Boulder, CO, USA
Phone
7203620446
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Labor Unions

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,847,619
Expenses
$1,200,580
Assets
$4,457,212
Liabilities
$289,608

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

30 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TIERNA DAVIDSON (PRESIDENT)
  • REBECCA ROUX (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • REBECCA ROUX (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $341,435 total reported compensation
  • ANTOINETTE REID (DIR. STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP): $198,024 total reported compensation
  • ALEX CARRASCO (VOTING MEMBER): $167,593 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The uswntpa serves as a leading advocate for women's soccer players, pioneering a new era of women's soccer as a preeminent sport. The primary mission of the uswntpa is to protect the rights of wnt players and to advance and safeguard the economic and social welfare of all wnt players, both on and off the field. The uswntpa is committed to raising the level of women's soccer domestically and continuing to grow the game worldwide.

What it reported doing in 2024

The uswntpa is comprised of 40 to 60 members at any given time, of which a portion are voting members in accordance with the uswntpa's bylaws. 3 player representatives who are elected, in accordance to the bylaws, serve as the officers. Improvement of economic and other working conditions of players the betterment and maintenance of relations between players and the federation, coaches, and staffs; the furnishing of information and services to the us women's national team players; the negotiation, execution, and administration of collective bargaining agreements; the resolution of player grievances, disputes, and arbitrations arising under collective bargaining agreements; the representation of players in connection with common problems; the development of enterprises aimed at evolving further benefits and/or revenues for the uswntpa and its members; encouragement of cultural, civic, legislative, charitable and other activities which further the interests of the uswntpa and its members, directly or indirectly, cooperation with and assistance to other organization having purposes or objectives in whole or in part similar to those of the uswntpa; and the performance of all other actions consistent with the uswntpa constitution and bylaws and appropriate to implement fulfill the purposes, rights, and responsibilities of the uswntpa.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 70% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 80
  • Accountability: 9
  • Sustainability: 70
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 35%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.71; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 117.9%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -79.4% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.4% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 27.3% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 0 of 27 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $341K · 30 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $322K reported
  • Consistency: 9 of 10 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 28 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.