United States Synchronized Swimming Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311123369
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Nashville, IL, USA
- Phone
- 3149205163
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $350,118
- Expenses
- $334,513
- Assets
- $3,452,066
- Liabilities
- $63,629
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Sandra Mahoney (President)
People named in this filing
- Sandra Mahoney (President)
- Amanda Styninger (Executive Dir.)
- Michelle Kinz (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Committed to Funding the Growth of the sport and preparing todays artistic swimmers to become tomorrows champions & leaders
What it reported doing in 2024
2024 Program AccomplishmentsIn 2024, the USA Artistic Swimming Foundation proudly advanced its mission to support and strengthen the sport of artistic swimming across the nation. Through strategic funding, grants, and collaborative initiatives, we provided meaningful resources to athletes, coaches, and programs at every level of competition.National Team Support: The Foundation continued its vital support of USA Artistic Swimmings national team programs, ensuring athletes had access to world-class training, facilities, and competition opportunities. These funds helped cover essential needs such as coaching, athlete development, international travel, and performance preparation for the Olympic Games. We also gave USA Artistic Swimming an additional grant in order to provide the necessary funds for our Olympic Team to travel and compete at the 2024 Olympic Games, which resulted in a silver medal and made history for the sport. By investing in the national teams, we are helping athletes reach their highest potential on the world stage while inspiring the next generation of swimmers.Development and Growth Programs: Beyond elite competition, the Foundation invested in the future of the sport by funding grassroots and developmental initiatives. This included grants to collegiate artistic swimming programs, enabling student-athletes to continue their passion for the sport while pursuing academic excellence. Additional funding supported training and certification programs for officials and coaches, elevating the overall standard of professionalism, safety, and excellence within the sport nationwide.Community and Organizational Impact: Through these efforts, the Foundation strengthened the artistic swimming community, broadened access to participation, and created a sustainable foundation for long-term success. Each dollar contributed by our donors directly impacts the athletes and leaders shaping the future of artistic swimming in the United States.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 50% for direct work, and 50% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 74.5%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.94 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.5%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.32; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.2% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 74.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 14 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $249K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 17/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.