United States of America Cricket Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
431106558
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2015
Forms available
Form 990 2015
Location
Lake Worth, FL, USA
Phone
5618391888
Rating
51
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$938,452
Expenses
$635,708
Assets
$173,130
Liabilities
$4,189,800

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GLADSTONE DAINTY (PRESIDENT)
  • ANTONI OWEN GREY (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MICHAEL GALE (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT- RESIGNED '15)
  • AHMED JEDDY (SECOND VICE PRESIDENT)
  • RAFEY SYED (SECOND VICE PRESIDENT-RESIGNED '15)

People named in this filing

  • GLADSTONE DAINTY (PRESIDENT)
  • ANTONI OWEN GREY (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MICHAEL GALE (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT- RESIGNED '15)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

United states of america cricket association (the organization or "usaca") is a non-profit organization that was established nearly 50 years ago. The purpose of the organization is to promote, encourage, foster and develop interest in and knowledge and understanding of the game of cricket throughout the united states of america ("U.S.a.") through the following activities:-membership in the international cricket council ("icc")-encouraging and assisting in promoting, administrating and hosting cricket games among member teams from various states, regions, zones and areas of the U.S.a.-fostering, encouraging and developing the highest standard of officiating cricket at all levels of the organization, through introduction of formal training and qualifications of umpires and scorers.-seeking to act as an exclusive national body controlling the game of cricket in the U.S.a.-fostering the development of youth and women's cricket at all levels.-ensuring that all cricket matches organized with

What it reported doing in 2015

United states of america cricket association hosted international teams (mens, womens, various youth) representing the USA in tournaments all around the world, and national competitions involving member leagues.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - Most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 34
  • Transparency & Controls: 55
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 57
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 32.3%; rating input score 32
  • Program expense ratio: 47.7%; rating input score 48
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 32.3%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 24.2; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -18.4% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -21.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 32.3% of revenue deployed · 47.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $303K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 19 people listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 32/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 48/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.