United States Intellectual Property Alliance Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
843783300
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Dunwoody, GA, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$29,446
Expenses
$36,628
Assets
$149,026

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Scott Frank (President)

People named in this filing

  • Scott Frank (President)
  • Mike Wright (Treasurer)
  • Mike Hobbs (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Improving United States intellectual property for a more innovative America. Through PR marketing and educational programs USIPA will bring awareness to what IP is why it is important and how everyone can play a role with it for the betterment of American lives. Together with educators USIPA will build the worlds most knowledgeable IP workforce by integrating IP training and skills development into K-12 university and other education curricula across the nation. USIPA brings together national and local stakeholders committed to IP development economic prosperity and social well being. Together we strive to facilitate a more efficient effective and collaborative IP ecosystem to help Americans get what they need faster and at a fair price. USIPA will be the role model for supporting all IP people and ideas regardless of race gender ethnicity nationality religion age disability or sexual orientation especially those that are underrepresented. USIPA will seek to include

What it reported doing in 2025

IP Celebration Event held in 2025 with an operating loss included in expenses

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -24.4%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.07; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -141.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -14.8% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.5% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.