United States Emc Standards

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232921599
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
St Croix Falls, WI, USA
Phone
7155547896
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Education N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$137,894
Expenses
$76,123
Assets
$453,693

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANIEL HOOLIHAN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DANIEL HOOLIHAN (PRESIDENT)
  • JANET O NEIL (VICE CHAIR)
  • BOB DELISI (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Develop and educate emc standards

What it reported doing in 2025

The u. S. Emc standards corporation, in conjunction with the american national standards institute (ansi) c63 committee on electromagnetic compatibility (emc) engineering, sponsors educational seminars on emc and develops american national standards in the general field of electrical engineering; specializing in the sub-area of emc engineering. In 2024, the u.s. Emc standards corporation sponsored 1 workshop on emc engineering which was 1.5 days in length and presented a -day tutorial on emc engineering standards at the 2024 ieee international symposium on emc held in phoenix, Arizona. Also, in 2024, the corporation published two american national standards on emc engineering. The corporation maintains twenty american standards in the subject area of emc engineering with a goal of revising each of the twenty standards at least every five years. Some of the american national standards developed by u.s. Emc standards corporation are utilized by the federal communications commission and the food and drug administration of the united states government to qualify products used by consumers in the USA.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 58
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 78
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 44.8%; rating input score 45
  • Program expense ratio: 79.5%; rating input score 79

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 44.8%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.96; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 44.8% of revenue deployed · 79.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $60K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.