United States Breastfeeding Committee Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 593674883
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2011
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 7733591549
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Adult, Continuing Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,465,013
- Expenses
- $1,232,532
- Assets
- $730,417
- Liabilities
- $63,737
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENNIFER DAY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- AUSTINA SHERMAN (INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- AUSTINA SHERMAN (INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $82,500 total reported compensation
- JENNIFER DAY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $64,843 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To drive collaborative efforts for policy and practices that create a landscape of breastfeeding support across the united states.
What it reported doing in 2024
See schedule o for complete description.pse changethe u.s. Breastfeeding committee (usbc) represents the most unified voice advocating for breastfeeding policy and practice change in the u.s., coordinating national, equity-centered collaborative efforts that contribute to population-level advancements that address longstanding barriers to human milk feeding and reduce disparities in breastfeeding outcomes. Usbc convenes constellations, action-focused work teams comprised of organizations focused on specific priority areas. Constellations share a learning journey, develop a common agenda, identify priority strategies, and implement activities through an equity lens to change the policy landscape. Usbc provides backbone support (online workspace, meeting design, and facilitation) to support these high-impact collaborative efforts in various areas, including workplace support, infant and young child feeding in emergencies, lactation support providers, and pasteurized donor human milk. In addition, the usbc embarks on an extensive process ahead of each congressional session, working with members and partners to identify the most pressing policy priorities for lactating families and the field to guide our collective efforts. Usbc monitors policy and legislative trends, opportunities, and risks, providing regular updates to the area. When collective action is needed, usbc mobilizes timely and strategic outreach to policymakers and the public to support policies and legislation supporting breastfeeding families. Connecting with multi-sectoral stakeholders, including federal agencies, members, partners, breastfeeding coalitions, congressional champions, and individuals across the nation, we can identify the solutions that families need and bring the voices of breastfeeding families to the halls of congress. These efforts have resulted in various landmark legislative achievements, including federal investments in breastfeeding and the recent passage of the providing urgent maternal protections (pump) for nursing mothers act.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 80% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 58.6%; rating input score 59
- Program expense ratio: 69.6%; rating input score 70
- Fundraising efficiency: $97.98 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.9%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.3% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 58.6% of revenue deployed · 69.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $858K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $82K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.