UNITED STATES BOWLING CONGRESS INC Central New Mexico

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
043818927
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Albuquerque, NM, USA
Phone
5052659158
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports Competitions

Reported finances

Revenue
$151,366
Expenses
$147,011
Assets
$353,661
Liabilities
$8,088

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Thomas Ellis (1st Vice President)
  • Patrick Martinez (Second Vice President)
  • Brenda Hamilton (President)

People named in this filing

  • Thomas Ellis (1st Vice President)
  • Rebecca Sanchez (Director)
  • Mary Meyer (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Membership Services Organization process membership and related activities for 3000 adult and youth member, conduct tournaments for various skill levels and age groups and provide recognition for championship and other participants, provide scholarship and other suitable awards for youth members

What it reported doing in 2024

Process memberships and related activities for about 3000 adult and youth members this year, (usually about 3700 members), conduct tournaments for various skill levels and age groups, and provide recognition for champions and other participants. Provide scholarships and other suitable awards for youth members.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 66% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 72% of its reported program spending for member benefits.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 97
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95.6%; rating input score 96
  • Program expense ratio: 98.4%; rating input score 98

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.9%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.41; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16.7%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.7% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18.1% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 95.6% of revenue deployed · 98.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $145K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 20 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.