United States Air Force Academy Colorado Parents' Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841198907
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Colorado Springs, CO, USA
- Phone
- 4104745252
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Military, Veterans' Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $94,036
- Expenses
- $56,686
- Assets
- $165,774
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
People named in this filing
- KIMBERLY CHERI (LEGACY PRESI)
- CHRIS TAMRA CARTER (CO VICE-PRES)
- SHAWNTE CAVANAUGH (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide an avenue for parents and guardians to enrich the united states air force academy experience of all Colorado cadets and the entire academy community.
What it reported doing in 2025
Football tailgates for all members of the Colorado parents' club hosted by the Colorado parents' club - 4,069 casab ball - the Colorado parents' club pays for all senior cadets to attend the Colorado all service academy ball - 0 sponsorship of usafa athletic awards - female cheerleader and male cheerleader - 2,000 contribution to rando fund (usafa endowment fund) - 2,000 the Colorado parents' club hosts a biennual event for all usafa cadets to celebrate their home states (taste of home) - 0 cadet morale dinner - 272 meet and greet - gathering of cadet parent's at different locations in Colorado - 247 cadet ring dance tickets - 1,210 total 9,798
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 75% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 56
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 45.4%; rating input score 45
- Program expense ratio: 72.9%; rating input score 73
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 39.7%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.92; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 45.4% of revenue deployed · 72.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $41K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.