United Professional Pro Force of Savannah River

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
262061726
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Aiken, SC, USA
Phone
8032956842
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Labor Unions

Reported finances

Revenue
$305,642
Expenses
$115,431
Assets
$999,989
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ERIC DAVIS (PRESIDENT)
  • DANIEL WOOD (VICE PRESIDENT/SAFETY OFFI)

Highest reported compensation

  • KENNIETH HOLMES (BUSINESS AGENT): $12,517 total reported compensation
  • ERIC DAVIS (PRESIDENT): $12,271 total reported compensation
  • DANIEL WOOD (VICE PRESIDENT/SAFETY OFFI): $9,641 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Uppsr, local no. 125 exists as a local assembly of bargaining unit personnel employed as security officers, security police officers (i, ii, iii), and any other classifications that are accepted by this membership. Local 125 has been fighting for working-class families for more than 30 years. We stand up for our members in the legislative, political, and social landscapes. We represent the interest of security police officers at the savannah river site, located in aiken South Carolina.

What it reported doing in 2025

The object of this local shall be to promote and protect the interest of our membership, to secure adequate pay for our work, to elevate the standard of our craft, to assist members in procuring employment and to protect our members by legal and proper means against any injustice.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 80
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 62.2%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.66; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 48.7%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -47.6% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.4% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $13K · 17 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 17 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.