United Nations Association of Minnesota
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 410634328
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- St Paul, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6124700123
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International, Foreign Affairs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $59,577
- Expenses
- $43,248
- Assets
- $81,142
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Fred Badiyan (President)
- Elizabeth Klages (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Fred Badiyan (President)
- Elizabeth Klages (Vice President)
- Dale Snyder (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The United Nations Association of Minnesota promotes the activities and principles of the United Nations in the state of Minnesota.
What it reported doing in 2025
The second most significant program we conduct are various advocacy activities to promote the United Nations and its activities to state and Congressional representatives, along with the general public. in 2025 they included having at least 3 volunteers attending a nationwide UN Advocacy Training Program, 24 people signing and promoting a UN sponsored Human Rights Petition, speaking to an open meeting of the public and the Minneapolis Uptown Rotary Club about the UN High Seas Treaty, 20 phone calls, 15 letters and 6 meetings with state representatives, along with the 2 Minnesota U.S. senators and 4 MN Congressmen, and got an article published about Human Rights and Democracy in a stateside news organization. Total volunteer man hours at least 200 and total people involved at least 100.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 70% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 55.3%; rating input score 55
- Program expense ratio: 79.7%; rating input score 80
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 27.4%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.88; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 55.3% of revenue deployed · 79.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $34K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.