United Movement Organized Kindness (UMOK)
Legal name: United Movement Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 383862033
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Las Vegas, NV, USA
- Phone
- 702-816-4997
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $242,107,947
- Expenses
- $145,831,626
- Assets
- $238,508,421
- Liabilities
- $299,341
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PETER POLITIS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- PETER POLITIS (PRESIDENT)
- SOPHYE WAGNER (OFFICER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Empowering Communities Through Organized Kindness
What it reported doing in 2024
At united movement, inc we are a source of philanthropy and and purposeful giving. Providing donated goods, orginally donated to the company from other nonprofits organizations. Helping individuals in the community and other nonprofits we provide needed donated household ware as well as everyday necessities including paper towels, toilet paper, cleaning products, diapers, etc. We receive the resources we need in order to consistently strengthen our communities. In 2020 united movement distributed more than $29 million in donated goods ($15 million of which was distributed specifically for covid relief) by leveraging our partnerships and expanding our operating capabilities to scale in order to support our partners impacted in covid relief supply. Supply.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Affiliate-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 98% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 61
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 84
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.2%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 99.9%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 2%; rating input score 2; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 39.8%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.64; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 45.1% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 53.7% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 89.1% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 60.2% of revenue deployed · 99.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 2 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $145.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 27 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 49 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 53 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 2/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.