United Methodist Senior Services of Desoto County Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 640850515
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Tupelo, MS, USA
- Phone
- 6628448977
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nursing, Convalescent Facilities
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,684,441
- Expenses
- $4,324,225
- Assets
- $5,111,806
- Liabilities
- $321,255
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEVE MCALILLY (PRESIDENT/CEO)
- JAMIE CLIETT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- JIM ZUELZKE (VICE PRESIDENT FINANCE)
- JEANNE CANTIN (VICE PRESIDENT/HR)
- BRITTANY CUEVAS (VICE PRESIDENT OF PHILANTHROPY)
Highest reported compensation
- STEVE MCALILLY (PRESIDENT/CEO): $678,537 total reported compensation
- CHRISTIE VANCE (VICE PRES/COO): $326,286 total reported compensation
- JIM ZUELZKE (VICE PRESIDENT FINANCE): $285,449 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
United methodist senior services of desoto coutny is dedicated to providing housing and personal care services to the elderly or disabled in the spirit of christian love.
What it reported doing in 2024
Wesley meadows retirement community, located in hernando, Mississippi, is a picturesque facility that sits in the middle of a sprawling meadow, on 40 scenic acres, with woods behind and a small pond to the side. The 101 unit community provides apartment style living for both independt and assisted living residents. Residents furnish their own apartments creating a home that is uniquely theirs. Independent living offers privacy and security so residents can thrive with the knowledge that they can maintain their independence in a safe environment at an affordable monthly rate with no up-front fee. With numerous activities to choose from and the daily cares of home maintenance eliminated, residents are free to enjoy their retirement the way it was meant to be. Assisted living bridges the gap between independent living and skilled nursing care. As elders reach the stage of life when they need additional help with the activities of daily living, wesley meadows assisted living is ready to provide individualized service so that residents maintain their dignity and as much independence as possible. In addition to traditional apartment living, wesley meadows has a newly constructed green house consisting of 10 assisted living units with a memory care focus. Each unit is a privatebedroom with private bathrooms that all surround a spacious common living area. The green house concept was created to promote elder engagement and socialization. Wesley meadows is staffed with knowledgeable, hardworking personnel whose goal is to provide safe, caring, christian retirement environment for the residents. The pastoral care programs and regularly scheduled activities engage residents and encourage life-long learning and friendships.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 81
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66.5%; rating input score 66
- Program expense ratio: 72.1%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.7%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.18; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.7%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 66.5% of revenue deployed · 72.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 18 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $679K · 21 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $1.1M reported
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 17 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.