United Interfaith Action of Se Ma
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311585685
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Fall River, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6173592680
- Rating
- 65
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations
- Affiliation
- Interfaith
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $306,714
- Expenses
- $207,717
- Assets
- $248,949
- Liabilities
- $11,251
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RENEE LEDBETTER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- RENEE LEDBETTER (PRESIDENT)
- ODETE AMARELO (TREASURER)
- LUCY DE OLIVEIRA (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Uia is a multi-faith, multi-purpose npo working collaboratively on issues to promote social, economic and racial justice. Uia recruits and trains leaders and clergy to act on issues, negotiate change and commit to the community.
What it reported doing in 2023
Bringing congregations together to put faith into action for social justice in southeastern ma, developing grassroot leaders to build community, identify common concerns, and take action for concrete change on local, statewide and national issues. Also, to assist families and individuals through covid.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 41
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 36.3%; rating input score 36
- Program expense ratio: 53.6%; rating input score 54
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.5 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 32.3%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.2; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.4% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.6% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 36.3% of revenue deployed · 53.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $111K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 36/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.