United Health Centers Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
460693359
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Fresno, CA, USA
Phone
5596466618
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$-2,917,952
Expenses
$523,550
Assets
$57,757,808
Liabilities
$60,569,919

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JUSTIN PREAS (CEO/ BOARD SECRETARY)
  • NATHAN WILLIAMS (BOARD PRESIDENT)
  • ERIN MELKONIAN (BOARD VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • JUSTIN PREAS (CEO/ BOARD SECRETARY): $993,736 total reported compensation
  • JESUS MALDONADO (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $457,259 total reported compensation
  • RICARDO VIVEROS (BOARD MEMBER): $258,457 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

United health centers foundation inc's specific purpose is to provide to as well as as to promote, support, and encourage the provision of health care services for underserved individuals and their families in the san juaquin valley and to support the united health centers of the san joaquin valley, inc., a federally qualified health center, and any and all related activities.

What it reported doing in 2025

The united health care (uhc) foundation, a supporting organization to united health centers of the san joaquin valley, is dedicated to providing resources to improve the health and quality of life of our communities. The uhc foundation was established to support community programs that extend beyond the scope of primary health care services in rural communities. The uhc foundation is operated exclusively for the benefit of and to carry out the purposes of the united health centers of the san joaquin valley, a federally qualified health center, that serves a largely medically underserved population in the central san joaquin valley in California.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 90% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 59
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 78.9%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.7%; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 72.7%; rating input score 73; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -117.9%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 110.32; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.05; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 31.6%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -45.4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.6% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 11 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $413K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $994K · 13 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.