United Court of the Lone Star Empire Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 752215544
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Dallas, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9727275518
- Rating
- 95
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- AIDS Research
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $122,492
- Expenses
- $115,672
- Assets
- $26,058
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Wayne Davis (President)
- Jacqueline Chamberlain (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Wayne Davis (President)
- Jacqueline Chamberlain (Vice President)
- Jerry McMahan (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We are a dedicated non-profit charity working tirelessly to uplift, support, and empower our beloved community. Our mission revolves around compassion, kindness, and making a positive impact in the lives of those in need. At the United Court of the Lone Star Empire, we believe that every individual deserves access to resources and support that can transform their lives. Our mission is to bridge gaps, provide assistance, and create opportunities for growth and prosperity. Together, we strive to nurture a spirit of generosity and kindness. In order to accomplish this, the organization hosts fundraising events (such as entertainment shows, car washes, bake sales) mostly raising $1.00 at a time.
What it reported doing in 2025
AIDs Services of Dallas ASD creates, strengthens, and sustains healthy communities by providing quality, affordable, service-enriched housing to economically disadvantaged individuals and families who are living with, impacted by, or at risk for HIV/AIDS.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 48% for direct work, and 52% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.4%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.6%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $116K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.