ADAPT Community Network
Legal name: United Cerebral Palsy of New York City Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 135654532
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 877-827-2666
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Birth Defects and Genetic Diseases
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $242,730,314
- Expenses
- $247,206,214
- Assets
- $349,723,700
- Liabilities
- $348,006,922
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GIDEON ASHER (Vice President/Treasurer)
- JAMES HAUSMAN (VICE PRESIDENT/SECRETARY)
- JAMES KASE (VICE PRESIDENT)
- KELLY E KAMINSKI (PRESIDENT)
- EDWARD R MATTHEWS (CEO, ADAPT COMMUNITY NETWORK (THRU 11/24))
- LINDA LAUL (CEO eff. 1/2025/Chief Operating Officer)
Highest reported compensation
- EDWARD R MATTHEWS (CEO, ADAPT COMMUNITY NETWORK (THRU 11/24)): $943,636 total reported compensation
- LINDA LAUL (CEO eff. 1/2025/Chief Operating Officer): $413,559 total reported compensation
- RAJESH SHAH (SENIOR ADVISOR TO CEO): $402,502 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Empowering people through innovative solutions, one person at a time. Our mission is to empower individuals through innovative solutions, one person at a time. These videos showcase some of those who embody the incredible spirit of the diverse community we support. stay connected CONTACT US. Diversity Mission Statement We** value diversity, equity, inclusion, accessibility and belonging. We** strive to ensure that each employee is comfortable bringing their whole, authentic self to work and that the people we support can also be their authentic selves.
What it reported doing in 2024
Education - adapt community network delivers high-quality early childhood and school-age special education services that promote person-centered learning, inclusion, and positive long-term outcomes for children and young adults with disabilities across New York city. Services support individuals from age 2 years, 9 months through 22 years and are approved and regulated by the New York state education department (nysed) in partnership with the New York city department of education (nyc doe). Preschool services include both special class and integrated education options, designed to support children with disabilities in developmentally appropriate settings alongside typically developing peers whenever possible. Integrated classrooms foster a sense of belonging, relationship building, and active participation in community based educational environments, while individualized supports address each child's unique learning, communication, and developmental needs. School age services provide mandated special education programming for students with multiple disabilities, with a focus on instructional quality, functional skill development, and preparation for greater independence. Emphasis is placed on building academic, social, and life skills that support meaningful participation in school and community life and facilitate successful transitions over time. Through all educational services, interdisciplinary teams collaborate to deliver individualized instruction and related supports that promote measurable progress toward educational goals and positive life outcomes. Educational services are funded through nysed-established tuition rates reimbursed by the nyc doe, as well as through universal prekindergarten (upk) and 3-k for all contracts. All services are grounded in adapt's commitment to choice, dignity, inclusion, and outcomes that matter most to children and their families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 97% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 91
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88.6%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 87%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $16.83 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.8%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.41; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.5%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.8% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 88.6% of revenue deployed · 87% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $215.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $944K · 23 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $7M reported
- Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 12 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.