United Cerebral Palsy of Central Ohio

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
314411238
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2010
Forms available
Form 990 2010
Location
Columbus, OH, USA
Phone
6142790109
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Birth Defects and Genetic Diseases

Reported finances

Revenue
$790,614
Expenses
$1,477,306
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of united cerebral palsy of central Ohio is to provide an environment where people with disabilities and aging conditions receive individualized programs and support services. We envision the empowerment of individuals to exercise control over their lives in a community that treats them with dignity and respect.

What it reported doing in 2010

The grace kindig adult day care program provides families with important respite services, while providing an alternative to nursing home care for older adults. The unique program is individualized for each person and is focused on interests and preferences of the indivudual. Participants are encouraged to remain active and maintain their level of independence through community outings, exercising, or reminiscing with friends. This year, 28 individuals were served through the grace kindig adult day care program.the victor warken habilitation program serves a diverse population of individuals 18 and older who have physical and/or mental disabilities. The services provided help to people with disabilities to socialize and build relationships with others in the community. The program also provides training on daily living skills. The services provided to participants are tailored to match each individual based on his or her preferences and needs. The program also provides expanded opportunities for a variety of community experiences. The art bridge studio gives participants with physical and developmental disabilities an outlet for recreation, therapy and self expression. The visual arts are the primary emphasis of the studio. Participants express themselves making ceramics, woodworking, modeling clay and painting. The philosophy of the program is to allow the person's disability to work for them. This perspective is taught through trial and error, historical context and the example of others. A group of participants within the program take their pursuit of a career as an artist very seriously, with one goal of the program being to market their work to a larger audience with the end result being to further their career.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 91% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 4
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -86.9%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.4%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -87.7% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $99K · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2009 to 2010
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.