United Cepic Sports Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 113486803
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Jackson Heights, NY, USA
- Phone
- 7184294221
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Fishing, Hunting
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $-1,575
- Expenses
- $1,275
- Assets
- $26,391
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARIO BELICH (VICE PRESIDENT)
- LUIGI VALENTA (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JOSIP B BABIC (PRESIDENT)
- VITORIO BELIC (VICE PRESIDENT)
- LAURA KENUL (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MARIO BELICH (VICE PRESIDENT)
- LUIGI VALENTA (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JOSIP B BABIC (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A) to provide for the mutual enjoyment, entertainment, and improvement of its members socially and physically by encouraging participation in some form of athletics or physical receation. B) to promote interest in hunting, fishing, boating, and other related sports.c) to aid in the protection of fish, birds, wildlife and game and to promote interest in its conservation. D) to give and promote social affairs, exhibitions, games, field trips and outings for the general enjoyment and entertainment of its members.e) to do any other act or thing incidental to or connected with the forgoing purposes or in adancement thereof, but not for pecuniary profit or financial gain of its members, directors or officers, except as permitted under article 5 of the not for profit corporation law.
What it reported doing in 2025
See attached schedule o
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -181%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 20.7; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -4.5% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.