United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners Union Local 122
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 231173344
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2014
- Location
- Collegeville, PA, USA
- Phone
- 6104098489
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Labor Unions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $119,198
- Expenses
- $107,409
- Assets
- $124,506
- Liabilities
- $30,849
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NOEL MCGUINNESS (PRESIDENT/DE)
People named in this filing
- NOEL MCGUINNESS (PRESIDENT/DE)
- THOMAS DUFFY (FIN. SEC/DEL)
- THOMAS FLYNN (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
United brotherhood of carpenters and joiners' purpose was to promote and protect the interest of membership, to encourage the apprenticeship system and higher standard of skill, to reduce the hours of labor, to secure adequate pay for their work, to elevate the standard of their craft, to cultivate a feeling of friendship among the members of the brotherhood, to assist its members in procuring employment and to protect the members by legal and proper means against any injustice that may be done to them, and to improve the moral, social and intellectual conditions of its members and all working people.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.1%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 93.2%; rating input score 93
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.9%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.16; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 19.2%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -19.3% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.1% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.1% of revenue deployed · 93.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $100K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2013 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 17 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.