United Animal Nations Dba Redrover

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
680124097
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
Phone
9164292457
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,956,194
Expenses
$6,338,489
Assets
$8,929,421
Liabilities
$639,868

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KATIE CAMPBELL (PRESIDENT & CEO)
  • KARLY NOEL (VICE PRESIDENT OF OPERATIONS & EDUCATION)
  • SUSAN ROBERT (VICE PRESIDENT OF PROGRAMS)

Highest reported compensation

  • KATIE CAMPBELL (PRESIDENT & CEO): $162,556 total reported compensation
  • SUSAN ROBERT (VICE PRESIDENT OF PROGRAMS): $124,498 total reported compensation
  • KARLY NOEL (VICE PRESIDENT OF OPERATIONS & EDUCATION): $118,119 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. Redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and supporters, collaborating with others and maximizing the use of online technology.

What it reported doing in 2024

Redrover relief - in 2024, redrover relief provided guidance, referrals, case management, and financial assistance to 5,810 good samaritans, animal rescuers and pet owners, helping them obtain emergency veterinary care for animals in life-threatening situations. Redrover relief case managers awarded 553 redrover relief grants, totaling $157,472 for these animals in crisis. We also awarded $45,000 to three veterinary clinics to provide grant funding directly to their clients, reducing barriers to clients receiving funding during emergency veterinary situations. Redrover relief case managers also worked with domestic violence advocates to help fleeing victims get their pets to safety. Redrover's safe escape grant program, which provides funding for urgent boarding and veterinary care for domestic violence victims' pets, provided 8,822 safe nights of boarding to 280 pets, giving 270 grants, totaling $239,247. In addition, redrover relief awarded 27 safe housing grants to domestic violence shelters, animal organizations, and homeless shelters, totaling $1,105,789. Redrover takes a long-term approach to helping domestic violence victims and their pets through these safe housing grants by giving shelters the funds and guidance needed to create permanent pet housing on-site, adjacent to, or outside the organization's shelter so that families may bring their pets directly to the shelter. Also in 2024, redrover continued its collaboration with greater good charities on the don't forget the pets (dftp) project to provide in-depth support on creating pet housing programs to communities across the country (and internationally!). This project includes a comprehensive website, training workshops and presentations (in-person and virtual), a downloadable training handbook, and a "coaching" program which provides one-on-one support to organizations. Funding received from petsmart charities in 2023 continues to support the growth and development of the dftp project.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 63% for direct work, and 37% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 87
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 71.9%; rating input score 72
  • Program expense ratio: 78.5%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.39 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.5%; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.9%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.41; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.4%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 71.9% of revenue deployed · 78.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $163K · 14 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 29 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 26 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.