United American Indian Involvement Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 952917933
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Ethnic, Immigrant Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,533,530
- Expenses
- $15,407,582
- Assets
- $24,065,619
- Liabilities
- $20,538,519
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOSEPH QUINTANA (INTERIM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFIC)
Highest reported compensation
- JEFFREY ROSENBERG (CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER): $285,878 total reported compensation
- DAVIS HONG (DENTAL DIRECTOR): $171,256 total reported compensation
- NORMA BLACKWATER (PHYSICIAN): $163,487 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promoting and supporting the physical, behavioral, spirtual well-being of american-indian/Alaska natives in the los angeles area by providing comprehensive and intergrated services tht focus on all age groups and incorporate american/indian/Alaska-native cultures and traditions.
What it reported doing in 2023
Promoting and supporting the physical, behavioral, and spritual well-being of american-indian/Alaska natives in the los angeles area by providing comprehensive and intergrated services that focus on all age groups and incorporate american-indian/Alaska-native cultures and traditions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 98% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 77
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.8%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 72.9%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $608.21 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.8%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.56; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.85; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.4%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 30.5% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.8% of revenue deployed · 72.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $286K · 11 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 20 of 23 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D expense reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D revenue reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 38/100.