United American Defense Force
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 853417792
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Greenwood Village, CO, USA
- Phone
- 7202524909
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $119,547
- Expenses
- $128,862
- Assets
- $29,782
- Liabilities
- $67,642
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Joe Oltmann (President)
People named in this filing
- Josh Barton (Board Member)
- Stu Butler (Board Member)
- Angela Rodriguez (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The United American Defense Force is a humanitarian aid organization that was created to support first responders and protect citizens. Whether for natural or man-made disasters, we believe it is the responsibility of citizens, for the people and by the people, to offer protection and support when first responders are unwilling or unable to fulfill their civic duties.Through these challenging times, the desperation and degree of civil disobedience in our society has become too significant to ignore. As we have seen in Kenosha, Seattle, and other cities across the country, there has not been adequate first aid services to citizens on the street. Citizens young and old are dying on the streets due to lack of access to medical care as first responders are being blocked from reaching victims in time. As bureaucrats continue to support defunding the police, the ability of first responders to provide care is dwindling quickly.
What it reported doing in 2021
We equipped and educated tens of thousands of parents on their rights to fight back against indoctrination education and grooming in the school system. We provided them with the tools to connect and mobilize collectively with other organizations and the resources and options to remove their children from the public school system, with enrollment alternatives free from unconstitutional and immoral indoctrination. We also created a digital platform that allowed businesses in local communities to connect to each other and for the public to have the ability to find businesses that are like-minded, while detaching from those organizations which support unethical and unconstitutional values, i.e., the Chamber of Commerce. We educated and connected pastors from around the nation with each other who share values and understand the crisis we are in as a nation. Lastly, we mobilized on several community emergencies and provided financial support during major crises.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 11
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7.8%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.27; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 74.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 17% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 39.5% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 158.4% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $129K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2020 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.