Union Wrestling Booster Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
222559848
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Union, NJ, USA
Phone
9086889360
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$46,125
Expenses
$42,914
Assets
$13,027

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NANCY ZUENA (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • NANCY ZUENA (PRESIDENT)
  • NANCY LODATO (1ST VP)
  • JIM LITTLE (2ND VP)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Special events include wrestling tournaments hosted at rented public school facilities and directed by volunteers. Admission fees, in addition to program and food sales are revenue producing. Other revenue is from fundraising for these events. The function of the union wrestling booster club is to promote the sport of wrestling. To this end the organization provides training and recreation function for all interested township residents between the ages of 6 and 13. The union wrestling booster club also supports middle and high school wrestling programs by providing equipment, awards, etc. To further assist the sport of wrestling.

What it reported doing in 2020

Special events include wrestling tournaments hosted at rented public school facilities and directed by volunteers admission fees, in addition to program and food sales are revenue producing. Other revenue is from fundraising for these events. The function of the union wrestling booster club is to promote the sport of wrestling. To this end the organization provides training and recreation function for all interested township residents between the ages of 6 an 13. The union wrestling booster club also supports middle and high school wrestling programs by providing equipment, awards, etc. To further assist the sport of wrestling.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 84% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.3; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2015 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.