Union County Economic Development Corp

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
222155884
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Cranford, NJ, USA
Phone
9085271166
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Urban, Community Economic Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,074,444
Expenses
$3,900,565
Assets
$26,377,019
Liabilities
$7,117,011

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

25 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ADAM FARRAH (PRESIDENT)
  • ERICH PETER (EXECUTIVE VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • ELIZABETH WILLIAMS (VICE-PRESIDENT LENDING)

Highest reported compensation

  • ADAM FARRAH (PRESIDENT): $285,558 total reported compensation
  • ERICH PETER (EXECUTIVE VICE-PRESIDENT): $214,232 total reported compensation
  • SANJAY MALIK (CONTROLLER): $204,258 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Promote & develop economic growth in New Jersey by providing financial and technical assistance to small businesses.

What it reported doing in 2025

Financial assistance program: ucedc's microloan program provides both start-up and existing businesses with an opportunity to borrow money for a variety of reasons, including purchasing equipment, fixtures or inventory; working capital; or making renovations on privately owned commercial real estate. Start-ups (operational for less than two years) can borrow a maximum of $35,000, with sufficient collateral, for up to six years. Older businesses with a profitable operating history are eligible for up to $50,000 for the same time period. Interest rates vary up to 7.75%, depending on the age and financial operations of the business and the owner's credit history. Loans may be prepaid without penalty.ucedc is one of only 40 lenders in the nation to offer the sba (7a) financing program, designed to encourage business growth and job creation. Long-term loans of up to $250,000 are available to start-up (in operation less than two years) and existing businesses.funds can be used for a wide variety of purposes including working capital; furniture/fixtures, machinery and equipment; land acquisition for commercial purposes; construction or renovation for privately owned commercial properties; leasehold improvements; and business acquisition. Interest rates are based on the amount of the loan and length of the loan depends on the use of the funds.the sba 504 program provides growing businesses with the opportunity to purchase, construct, or improve their own building or purchase major equipment through long-term, below-market fixed rate financing. Ucedc works in partnership with commercial lenders to structure financing that typically calls for only a 10% contribution from the borrower. Soft costs and closing costs can be rolled into the loan, maximizing cash flow that can be invested back into the business. Ucedc's portion of the financing represents a maximum of 40% of the total (up to $5.5 million), with 10-25 year terms.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.6%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 86.5%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.3%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.76; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 35.4%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 88.6% of revenue deployed · 86.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $3.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $286K · 25 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.