Unified Health Solutions Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
310727292
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2014
Forms available
Form 990 2014
Location
Dayton, OH, USA
Phone
9372206600
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Health Systems

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$831,663
Expenses
$837,723
Assets
$84,199
Liabilities
$450,888

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DONERIK BLACK (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • DONERIK BLACK (CEO): $65,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Unified health solutions (uhs) is a non-profit corporation serving individuals, families, and communities primarily in greene, montgomery counties.

What it reported doing in 2014

Prevention for youth; first step is a comprehensive prevention and academic after-school and summer camp enrichment program. The program operates year round five days a week during the school year and 4 days a week in the summer months. The award winning first step program provides prevention services during that critical time period after school when juvenile crime is at its highest as thousands of youth go to unsupervised homes. First step serves about 150 students annually. Project empower is the program whose goal is to reduce the use and abuse of alcohol, tobacco and other durgs among pregnant and parenting teens. Project empower utilitizes a health decision making skills curriculum and works to teach parenting skills including healthy relationships (anger managment, communication, domestic violence and negotiating skills) and support (getting a job, insurance, financial, legal, school issues, and stress managment) project empower serves about 400 students annually.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 74% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 81.4%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 80.8%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.7%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.1; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 5.36; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.8%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -21.4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -22.3% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -35% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 81.4% of revenue deployed · 80.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $677K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $65K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 44/100.