Unidos En La Mision Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 871103241
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Doral, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3057121040
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Academic Exchange
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $538,107
- Expenses
- $621,064
- Assets
- $828,697
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
People named in this filing
- RAFAEL GARRIDO SJ (DIRECTOR)
- JESUS RODRIGUEZ VILLARROEL SJ (DIRECTOR)
- PEDRO A SUAREZ (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To carry out all kinds of charitable activities, promoting solidarity and raising resources, to strengthen the initiatives and charitable works with the values of the society of jesus. To provide education and integral formation, promoting exchange programs between countries, where the jesuit order develops spiritual and social work. To establish and develop research programs in religious studies. To promote the practice of the social mission in accordance with the values of the jesuit order through cultural and educational events and seminars. To coordinate and promote a wide network of alumni, friends, benefactors, volunteers, institutions and companies that are committed to integral education. To promote a model of education that prepares low-income students to be eligible to participate in exchange programs with other educational institutions in the united states. To provide information about educational projects, works and achievements of the society of jesus
What it reported doing in 2024
Border area fieldwork bolstering local communities, support networks our group lately started a fieldwork adventure near venezuela's border zone, hoping to personally understand the problems the locals have and what's done to assist. This mission gave us a chance to speak with neighborhood groups and community figures really working on migration, helping refugees, also building their community in this key zone. We hit tchira first, where we could see the universidad catlica del tchira or ucat. While there, we gave a communications and fund raising class to give local leaders some better skills. This workshop, leaded by alejandra carmona, communications guru, with corina trujillo, in charge of help and building up institutions. It involved leaders of several local social orgs. These leaders learned good comms and fundraising, giving them more tools to aid their own communities. Onward, our voyage proceeded, venturing to the jesuit refugee service jrs office in tchira. We met with the dedicated folks there to grasp their efforts. They shed light on the vital help offered to refugees and migrants, right on that border. Jrs's services are quite essential, aiding migrants crossing states and those venezuelan's returning from abroad, a group impacted by quite a few things. Supporting these people is pretty darn critical as that region grapples, still, with displacement. Then, we journeyed to the parroquia de san camilo de lelis in apure. We crossed paths with key community figures working with father henry quintero sj and father gerardo rosales sj providing much needed pastoral and community backing. Their hard work is very important, offering spiritual support and social aide to keep the community thriving. Ultimately our mission ended, with stops at two agriculture schools run by fe y alegra in apure. Witnessing how younger students got their high school education with that emphasis on the sciences of farming. Here's the refined text: such schools, they really do give important skills which let learners jump into the areas farming provides, boosting the region's economy while securing food. Travels across states and districts, these trips definitely help our team work better, so we're sure to stick to supporting locals via projects and sharing resources. And by joining with our partner's well, we hope that local leaders' strengths are built up; schooling is enhanced, and we address those urgent needs faced by refugees, travelers and peoples in need.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 81% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 80
- Accountability: 6
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 86.6%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $24.25 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -15.4%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.33; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 150% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 41.5% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 51.8% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 86.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $538K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.