Uneed2 Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
770549779
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2008
Location
Tracy, CA, USA
Rating
39
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Family Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$104,833
Expenses
$103,628
Assets
$4,943

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ERIC HAWKINS (PRESIDENT)
  • LYNDA HAWKINS (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ERIC HAWKINS (PRESIDENT)
  • LYNDA HAWKINS (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Uneed2 Inc. delivers essential computer training technical support and computer systems to economically disadvantaged individuals and nonprofit organizations. Our programs empower individuals to develop critical digital skills enhancing their employability and access to opportunities. Additionally we equip nonprofits with the necessary technology to enhance their operational efficiency and impact in the community. Through these services we strive to bridge the digital divide and create a more inclusive society for all.

What it reported doing in 2024

Uneed2 inc. Provides job search and independent living skills, training and development. Uneed2 inc. Strives to elevate the marketability and self esteem of clients seeking employment.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 11
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 11.1%; rating input score 11
  • Program expense ratio: 11.2%; rating input score 11

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.1%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16.2%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -40.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -11.4% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 11.1% of revenue deployed · 11.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $12K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 11/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 11/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.