Unc Student Television Incorporated

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
582068291
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Phone
9199621159
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Arts, Culture, and Humanities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$58,524
Expenses
$40,418
Assets
$122,629
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SAMANTHA HINES (PRESIDENT (THRU 1/23))
  • RAGUELL COACH (PRESIDENT (FROM 1/23))

People named in this filing

  • SAMANTHA HINES (PRESIDENT (THRU 1/23))
  • RAGUELL COACH (PRESIDENT (FROM 1/23))
  • ROHAN SHARMA (TREASURER (THRU 9/22))

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide tv programming for unc-ch.

What it reported doing in 2022

Student television, inc ("stv") provides educational entertainment and news programs for the benefit of the student body at the university of North Carolina at chapel hill and the student groups which utilize stv's teleconferencing and videotaping services. Stv provides realistic training for student actors, musicians, script writers, camera operators, file editors, and journalists.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 66
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 56.4%; rating input score 56
  • Program expense ratio: 81.6%; rating input score 82

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 30.9%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.03; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 45.3%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -10.2% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 56.4% of revenue deployed · 81.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $33K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2013 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.