Unc School of Dentistry Alumni Associati

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
566065783
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Phone
9195373257
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,400
Expenses
$60,288
Assets
$2,250,735
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN W MCNEILL (PRESIDENT)
  • RALPH MENSAH (VICE - PRESIDENT)
  • PAIGE T HOLBERT (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
  • KAYLEE CUTLER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • KAYLEE CUTLER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $94,163 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The unc adams school of dentistry alumni association (uncdaa) exists to support the mission and purpose of the unc adams school of dentistry: transforming dentistry for better health educating and empowering the next generation of leaders in oral health care through excellence in education, research, patient care, and service.

What it reported doing in 2024

The uncdaa provides funding to students attending and presenting at conferences. The uncdaa provides funding for students to attend local dental society meetings for continuing education and mentorship opportunities. The uncdaa provides scholarship support to dental students to help relieve the financial burden of debt.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 76% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 93.7%; rating input score 94
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -842%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 37.33; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 50.6%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.7% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -15.8% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $56K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $94K · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.