Unashamed Unafraid

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
844933048
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Sandy, UT, USA
Phone
8016471880
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Addictive Disorders N.E.C.
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$156,177
Expenses
$136,876
Assets
$58,978

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Steven W Shields (Board Member)
  • Steven T Herd (Board Member)
  • James Willhite (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of Unashamed Unafraid is to provide education to and support for individuals pursuing sexual addiction recovery. Education and other forms of support will be provided with hope, love, and compassion centered in faith in Jesus Christ.

What it reported doing in 2025

Unashamed Unafraid has published numerous blog posts and podcast episodes each year to share educational material, advice from experts in the field, and heartfelt personal stories that bring hope that recovery and healing are possible. We have published on our website information about different resources people can look to for help, including free resources. We have also raised funds for scholarships to send individuals in addiction and those betrayed by them to different spiritual, wellness, coaching, and therapy retreats and experiences to help them in their healing process.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 92
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.6%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12.4%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.43; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 41.4% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 34% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 25.2% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $137K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.