Unalaska Senior Citizens
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 920142568
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Unalaska, AK, USA
- Phone
- 9075815195
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Supportive Housing for Older Adults
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $357,358
- Expenses
- $362,765
- Assets
- $138,979
- Liabilities
- $465
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Daneen Looby (President)
- Harriet Berikoff (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- Agnes Shaishnikoff (Program Manager): $39,838 total reported compensation
- Kelly Poziombke (CAO): $22,248 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Unalaska senior citizens is committed to providing nutrition, transportation, information and support services that promote the health and well-being of our elders and to assist them in living independently and remaining active, vital members of our community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Nutrition Services: Provides nutritious meals five days per week in alignment with current dietary guidelines to support the health and well-being of seniors in the community. During the fiscal year, 4,809 meals were served to 67 participants, promoting nutrition, food security, and social engagement within the community.Transportation Services: Provides reliable transportation to support senior independence and access to essential services. Services include trips for grocery shopping, banking, medical appointments, and community activities. During the fiscal year, 835 rides were provided to 23 individuals, ensuring consistent access to critical community resources. Homemaker Services Provides: light housekeeping services to assist seniors in maintaining safe and independent living environments. During the fiscal year, 155 homemaker service instances were provided, helping seniors remain in their homes with dignity.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 63
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.3%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 90.9%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: $163.4 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.5%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.1%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 36.4% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 92.3% of revenue deployed · 90.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $330K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $40K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.