Unaids-USA

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
460792385
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2018
Forms available
Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2012
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2024602204
Rating
42
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
AIDS

Reported finances

Revenue
$45
Expenses
$6,670
Assets
$70,725
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • James Sherry (President and Treasurer)
  • Sandra Thurman (Vice President and Secretary)

People named in this filing

  • James Sherry (President and Treasurer)
  • Sandra Thurman (Vice President and Secretary)
  • A Cornelius Baker (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support and advance efforts to address the global AIDS epidemic, in particular the efforts of the Joint United Nations Program on HIV.AIDS and its partners to: Provide leadership in achieving universal access to HIV prevention, treatment, care and support; Promote dignity, human rights and gender equality to those afflicted with HIV and their families; and Empower and provide information that will promote prevention, treatment, care and support in an effort to reverse the spread of HIV; Advance understanding within the United States on the unique role of the UN System in addressing the global AIDS epidemic and advancing global health, and Collaborate with organizations in other parts of the world who share these purposes and are affiliated with the Joint United Nations Program on HIV.AIDS.

What it reported doing in 2018

Support the United Nations Joint UN Program on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) to partner with the United States and other Government and NGO funded efforts to expand AIDS Awareness, HIV testing and treatment programs around the world.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -14,722.2%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.6; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -103.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -95.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -16.4% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2015 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.