Umpqua Valley Wrestling Association Roseburg Mat Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
931038359
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Roseburg, OR, USA
Phone
5415802734
Rating
39
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Secondary, High School

Reported finances

Revenue
$62,688
Expenses
$45,075
Assets
$32,145
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAKE SPEARS (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JAKE SPEARS (PRESIDENT)
  • MARQ RANDALL (TREASURER)
  • SAVANNAH HALL (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Umpqua valley wrestling association is organized and operated exclusively for charitable and educational purposes in the umpqua valley community. Its purpose is to promote amateur wrestling by providing youth with access to coaching, training, competition, and character-building opportunities that encourage physical fitness, discipline, teamwork, and sportsmanship within the roseburg and greater umpqua valley community.

What it reported doing in 2024

Umpqua valley wrestling association provides organized wrestling practices, coaching, and competitive opportunities for local youth. This creates an opportunity to foster athletic development and personal growth. The program emphasizes skill development, physical conditioning, mentorship, and positive community involvement while making the sport accessible to participants regardless of financial ability.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 63% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 28.1%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 126.3% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 75.5% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.