UMI Community Imaging Clinic
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 832309570
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Aug 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Fair Oaks, CA, US
- Phone
- 916-970-0577
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $72,919
- Expenses
- $80,363
- Assets
- $4,749
- Liabilities
- $18,950
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- INNA LISKER (PRESIDENT & CEO)
People named in this filing
- INNA LISKER (PRESIDENT & CEO)
- ALI CHAICHI (CONSULTANT)
- TIMOTHY MCKINNEY (CONTROLLER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote public health by providing physician-ordered, free and donation-based ultrasound scanning for patients who are uninsured, underserved, or otherwise unable to access essential imaging services. Our goal is to support early detection and timely clinical decision-making by supplying high-quality ultrasound images to referring healthcare providers.
What it reported doing in 2025
Umi community imaging clinic is a student-run diagnostic medical sonography facility that serves 600-700 patients every year. Umi community imaging clinic has an average of 50 student-volunteers that are dedicated to providing quality care to patients who are uninsured or unable to pay for the potentially life-saving procedure.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 82% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -10.2%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 3.99; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 24.9% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -81.9% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $80K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.