Umarmy-nxnw Tx
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 464286713
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2014
- Location
- Huntsville, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2817284593
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Military, Veterans' Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $83,000
- Expenses
- $78,045
- Assets
- $30,735
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SCOTT ATNIP (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- DEREK BLACKMON (PRESIDENT)
- HOLLY MC CUISTION (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SCOTT ATNIP (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- DEREK BLACKMON (PRESIDENT)
- HOLLY MC CUISTION (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Organize camps for youth to make repairs on the homes of the handicapped and elderly persons.
What it reported doing in 2014
Mission work weeks- four camps are organized the current year. Each camp benefits an average of 150 people, so 600 youth, handicapped and elderly people
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 85% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 64.1%; rating input score 64
- Program expense ratio: 68.1%; rating input score 68
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.39; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 24%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 24.9% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.5% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 64.1% of revenue deployed · 68.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $53K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2013 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.