Ukrainian American House

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
833993982
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
Phone
9162010101
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$764,624
Expenses
$795,189
Assets
$185,268
Liabilities
$43,752

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CAROLEANA KVATERCHUK ALLISON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • CAROLEANA KVATERCHUK ALLISON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $60,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide an effective platform for ukrainian-american cooperation in the humanitarian, economic, cultural, educational, social, and political spheres. Additionally, we want to raise awareness about ukraine in the united states and increase its support to ensure stable delivery of humanitarian aid to ukraine, support ukrainian refugees in the united states and create prerequisites for business and econonic recovery of ukraine.

What it reported doing in 2024

The annual ukrainian independence day celebration in sacramento is a vibrant tribute to ukrainian identity, unity, and cultural resilience. Ukrainian american house participated in the listos California initiative to help immigrants, refugees, and limited-english-speaking households prepare for natural disasters. The humane society program provided food for animals affected by the war in ukraine, while the medical aid program supported children's hospitals and delivered ambulances to assist with medical care. We also hosted a national ukraine forum, bringing together ukrainian community leaders from across the u.s., including representatives from the social, business, religious, and political sectors. U.s. Officials, ukrainian parliament members, and nonprofit leaders participated in discussions focused on supporting ukraine and strengthening the ukrainian-american diaspora. The forum served as a platform for collaboration, strategic planning, and uniting efforts to advance ukraine's path to freedom.mental health program - ukrainian american house provides culturally and linguistically appropriate emotional support to ukrainian refugees affected by war-related trauma. Many clients experience depression, ptsd, and insomnia as a result of violence, loss, and displacement. The program offers individual and group therapy, peer counseling, and referrals to licensed psychologists. With client consent, we also assist with care coordination, interpretation, and accompany clients to appointments to ensure they receive the support they need.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 60% for direct work, and 40% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 77
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 89.4%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 86%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: $558.8 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 98%; rating input score 98; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.5%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 18.2% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -9.1% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -51.6% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 89.4% of revenue deployed · 86% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $684K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $60K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.