Ukraine War Animals Relief Fund

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
920430918
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Seattle, WA, USA
Phone
2062278894
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$67,877
Expenses
$64,144
Assets
$15,623
Liabilities
$6,990

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAMES TIMOTHY KUNIN (PRESIDENT/CH)

People named in this filing

  • JAMES TIMOTHY KUNIN (PRESIDENT/CH)
  • JAMES GRANGE (SECRETARY/VI)
  • TRACY STONE (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Uwarf is committed to preventing a surge in stray dog and cat populations and combating the spread of rabies in ukraine. We advocate for and implement sterilization and vaccination programs for homeless pets in war- affected areas, ensuring a safer future for both animals and communities.

What it reported doing in 2025

Maintained and expanded under the sun sanctuary. Currently house 150 dogs rescued as homeless pets as a result of the illegal russian invasion of ukraine. Built a kitchen for making dog food, provided transportation and a mobile x-ray machine to be used at the front. Uwarf completed a documentary showing the result of the russian invasion on the pets near the front. Many are left homeless and need to be fed, sterilized and vaccinated. Without sterilization, the population will grow unbridled. Also, without vaccination the animals will spread disease, including rabies. The documentary was completed and has garnered 14 laurels from film festivals. The 54 minute documentary is called war tails. Provided support for missions to rescue animals near the front lines.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 41% for direct work, and 59% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 69%; rating input score 69
  • Program expense ratio: 73%; rating input score 73

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.5%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.24; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.45; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 50.7% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -13.9% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -23.2% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 69% of revenue deployed · 73% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $47K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.