Ukirk Tcu

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
332861775
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Fort Worth, TX, USA
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Protestant

Reported finances

Revenue
$59,613
Expenses
$25,197
Assets
$34,416

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Rev Sarah Crowther-Dixon (Executive Director Campus Pastor)
  • Rev Dr Robyn Michalove (UKirk TCU Board President)

People named in this filing

  • Rev Sarah Crowther-Dixon (Executive Director Campus Pastor)
  • Rev Dr Robyn Michalove (UKirk TCU Board President)
  • Victor Letbetter (UKirk TCU Board Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

UKirk TCU undertakes and supports Presbyterian Church USA ministry on the campus of Texas Christian University which will include weekly worship weekly meals administration of sacraments pastoral care and works of charity spiritual care and religious education with the meaning of section 501c3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

What it reported doing in 2025

Supported the Montreat College Conference in Montreat NC. We sponsored four students and two adults including airfare transportation food and registration costs. Conference is a Presbyterian Church U.S.A. nationwide conference bringing students from all over the country together to worship and be encouraged.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 48
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 31.6%; rating input score 32
  • Program expense ratio: 74.7%; rating input score 75

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 57.7%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.37; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 31.6% of revenue deployed · 74.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 5 filed program accomplishments · $19K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 32/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.