Uci University Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 952504946
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016
- Location
- Irvine, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9492857635
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Recreational l Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $687,505
- Expenses
- $551,336
- Assets
- $493,984
- Liabilities
- $286,076
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
People named in this filing
- JENNY DUKE (Secretary)
- GARY MATKIN (Director)
- JACK BALDRIDGE (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The uci university club, inc. (the club) supports university of California, irvine campus (the university) in meeting its educational, research, and community service goals by providing a comfortable, welcoming environment for professional and social interaction between members of the campus community and between members of that community and the broader community for lunch service and catered events. The club provides full-service meals, high-quality service, and meeting and banquet facilities for the use and enjoyment of the university's affiliates, departments and their guests. The club supports the outreach efforts of the university by providing banquet facilities and catering services for university community members to host special events as well as subsidized meals for non-profit university organization events.
What it reported doing in 2016
The uci university club, inc. (the club) continues to provide major support for the university of California, irvine campus (the university) in meeting its educational and institutional goals. During 2016, on a daily basis the club hosted in house university events and on campus events in support of the university's fund raising, educational seminars, faculty and staff recruitment, campus employee student recognition, community interaction and business pursuits. In addition, the club also provided support for the weekly university forum, associated with the university of California, irvine campus, featuring lectures on a variety of academic and community interest topics.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 80
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.2%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.8%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.58; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7.9% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $551K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2013 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.