Ucgpc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
920830113
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Phone
4159103029
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$181,462
Expenses
$167,261
Assets
$141,704
Liabilities
$1,106

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

24 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ryan Manriquez thru 63025 (President)
  • Stephanie Valadez (President)

People named in this filing

  • Patriccia Ordonez-Kim (Executive Dir.)
  • Ryan Manriquez thru 63025 (President)
  • Stephanie Valadez (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

UCGPC advocates on behalf of all UC Graduate and Professional students to help build productive relationships between students, the University, and the public.

What it reported doing in 2024

For the 2024-2025 academic year, the University of California Graduate and Professional Council (UCGPC) achieved several significant accomplishments in its mission to enhance the graduate student experience across the UC system: 1) Advocacy and Policy Impact: a) Fielded robust delegations for both State and Federal Advocacy Days, engaging directly with state budget committees and federal agencies, 2) Events and Outreach: a) Successfully organized and executed the Grad Summit 2024, fostering connection and collaboration among graduate students, b) Facilitated graduate participation in Student Regent interviews, ensuring strong graduate representation. 4) Coalition Building: a) Strengthened partnerships with organizations such as CEJA, UCSA, and NAGPS on issues including basic needs, housing, and legislative advocacy.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 68% for direct work, and 32% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 64.7%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 70.2%; rating input score 70

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.8%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.85; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 94.6% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 21.1% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 30.6% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 64.7% of revenue deployed · 70.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $117K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 24 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.