United Church Homes
Legal name: UCC XIX Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 300308421
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Marion, OH, USA
- Phone
- 7403824885
- Rating
- 49
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Interfaith Coalitions
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $441,426
- Expenses
- $512,780
- Assets
- $1,199,335
- Liabilities
- $3,890,018
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Cathy Green (President)
- Daniel C Fagan Jr (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- John Renner (Treasurer): $462,483 total reported compensation
- Terry Spitznagel (Secretary): $459,103 total reported compensation
- Daniel C Fagan Jr (Vice President): $213,228 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To Provide Safe and Affordable Housing for Low-Income Persons. With UCH Cares, we’ve deepened our commitment to support the varied needs of the older adults we’re honored to serve. United Church Homes is on a mission to offer access to the abundant living tools and supports you deserve to live your best life. Our list of personal care services provided through UCH Cares is always evolving and includes: Errands and shopping. Service Coordination with NaviGuide As we age and our daily needs change, it can be comforting to know you have someone in your corner to help guide you through life’s twists and turns. A helping hand or expert advisor can make all the difference in ensuring you enjoy the lifestyle of comfort and security you deserve as an older adult. This is why United Church Homes provides additional support services to our residents living independently to help them live their...
What it reported doing in 2024
The sole purpose is to provide subsidized apartment rental income to approximately 46 low-income elderly and/or handicapped persons through the U.S. Department of HUD section 202 program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 24
- Transparency & Controls: 69
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 28.5%; rating input score 28
- Program expense ratio: 25%; rating input score 25
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -16.2%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.34; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 3.24; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 23.3%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -8.9% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -6.5% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 28.5% of revenue deployed · 25% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $128K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $462K · 12 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 25/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.