UCare
Legal name: Ucare Minnesota
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 363573805
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Stuart, VA, USA
- Phone
- 6126766500
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,081,906,710
- Expenses
- $7,483,125,595
- Assets
- $1,247,673,340
- Liabilities
- $1,121,188,875
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
30 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- HILARY MARDEN-RESNIK (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- HILARY MARDEN-RESNIK (PRESIDENT & CEO): $1,449,717 total reported compensation
- BETH MONSRUD (SVP, CFO & TREASURER): $787,749 total reported compensation
- TENBIT EMIRU (EVP, CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER): $777,970 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
UCare is an independent, non-profit health plan providing health coverage and services across Minnesota, working in partnership with health care providers and community organizations to help members access care and manage their health. Meet our partners who help us make our mission possible. Learn more UCare Foundation. An independent, non-profit health plan company that's powered by some of the hardest working people you'll ever meet. By partnering with health care providers and community organizations across Minnesota, we provide, de-complicate and figure out health coverage for our customers. UCare is an independent, nonprofit health plan providing health coverage and services across Minnesota. Working in partnership with health care providers and community organizations, UCare serves: Individuals and families choosing health coverage through MNsure, the insurance marketplace.
What it reported doing in 2025
See schedule o
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 97.7%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.7%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.17; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.9; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.1%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 97.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 1 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $7.3B in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 30 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $61.8M reported
- Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 28 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.