Uca Development
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 831709857
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Phone
- 8014105706
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,463,617
- Expenses
- $182,968
- Assets
- $8,250,014
- Liabilities
- $6,240,000
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- JAKE HAWKINS (DIRECTOR)
- TARA ROLLINS (DIRECTOR)
- MIKE GALLEGOS (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To empower individuals, strengthen families and build communities through self-reliance and education programs with a focus on combatting poverty.
What it reported doing in 2025
Uca development constructed a facility that enables uca to reach those most in need in the community and support them on the road to self-reliance. This facility creates a home base that connects the individuals to their community, empowering them toward stability and ultimate self-reliance - cultivating a love of home and neighborhood.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 93% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 38
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 87
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 13.1%; rating input score 13
- Program expense ratio: 91.5%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 92.6%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 45.09; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.76; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 49.7% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 13.1% of revenue deployed · 91.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $167K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2018 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 13/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.