UC Health
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311435820
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2013
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2013
- Location
- Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Phone
- 513-585-6200 (billing/customer service number shown on UC Health financial page)
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Health Systems
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,344,956,198
- Expenses
- $1,280,570,038
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Richard P LofgrenMDst 1213 (CEO/President, Trustee (Ex-Officio))
- James Kingsbury end 1213 (CEO/President)
- Kevin Joseph MD (President - West Chester Hospital)
- Myles Pensak MD (President - UC Physicians Company)
- Lee Ann Liska start 713 (President - UC Medical Center)
- W Brian Gibler MDend 613 (Former President - UC Medical Center)
Highest reported compensation
- James Kingsbury end 1213 (CEO/President): $1,369,262 total reported compensation
- Diya Mutasim MD (Physician): $1,357,184 total reported compensation
- Hugh Gloster MD (Physician): $969,141 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
UC Health is care centered around connecting research, clinical trials, care teams, and ongoing wellness—to create a path to new possibilities (“Research That’s Improving Lives & Changing Medicine”). To support this goal, we are continuing our commitment to become a High Reliability Organization (HRO). This means standardizing how we work, anticipating risks before they become issues and consistently applying proven safety practices across every role and every site. We believe that **safety starts with us**. Each of us plays a critical role in create a safe, reliable environment—for our patients, our colleagues and our community. About UC Health.
What it reported doing in 2013
Health Professions Education: Program Service Revenue - $18,817,786, Program Service Expenses - $80,419,530; Traditional Charity Care: Program Service Revenue - $38,375,688, Program Service Expenses - $76,295,675; Community Health Improvement Services: Program Service Revenue - $10,125, Program Service Expenses - $7,253,629; Financial and In-Kind Contributions: Program Service Expenses - $1,220,678.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 97% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Assets have declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 87
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 89.3%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 96.2%; rating input score 96; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 77.8%; rating input score 78; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.8%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.8%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 66.4% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -22.5% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 86% of revenue deployed · 89.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.1B in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 24 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $38M reported
- Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 34 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 33 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.