Ub Family Medicine Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
161280696
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Buffalo, NY, USA
Phone
7168984744
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Group Health Practice (Health Maintenance Organizations)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$16,733,738
Expenses
$17,850,857
Assets
$5,615,247
Liabilities
$3,617,166

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANDREA MANYON MD (PRESIDENT)
  • DIANA WILKINS MD (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • KIMBERLY WILKINS MD (SECRETARY): $423,951 total reported compensation
  • ROBERT MACEK MD (TREASURER): $345,683 total reported compensation
  • ARTHUR WEISSMAN MD (PHYSICIAN): $333,867 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Ub family medicine, inc. Is committed to encourage and assist the faculty of the department of family medicine at the jacobs school of medicine at the state university of New York at buffalo in the delivery of health care. The organization also is committed to improving the ability of the faculty to perform clinical research, maximizing their resources to foster academic, research and clinical programs, recruiting and retaining targeted teaching physicians, and encouraging and supporting the personal growth and professional development of the faculty of the department of family medicine. Ub family medicine, inc. Is also intended to provide financial support for the development and growth of the department of family medicine.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 77
  • Accountability: 42
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95.9%; rating input score 96
  • Program expense ratio: 90%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -6.7%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.31; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.64; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 95.9% of revenue deployed · 90% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 20 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $424K · 10 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.